首页> 外文OA文献 >Cleaning of used rotary nickel-titanium files in an ultrasonic bath by locally intensified acoustic cavitation
【2h】

Cleaning of used rotary nickel-titanium files in an ultrasonic bath by locally intensified acoustic cavitation

机译:通过局部增强的声空化清洁超声波浴中用过的旋转镍钛锉

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aim To compare the pre-sterilization cleaning of rotary Ni-Ti files of different sizes previously used a. ex vivo and b. clinically by a washer disinfector, a regular ultrasonic bath, and the same ultrasonic bath in combination with a recently developed cavitation intensifying method. Methodology Two sets of two hundred rotary Ni-Ti files, one previously used ex vivo and another one used clinically, were collected from the undergraduate and postgraduate clinics of the Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA). The instruments were immersed in an enzymatic solution and subsequently cleaned either by a washer disinfector, a regular ultrasonic bath combined with a glass beaker, the same bath combined with a beaker lined with two cavitation intensifying sheets or with two standard plastic sheets. The positive control consisted of used files that did not undergo any cleaning and the negative control included new unused files. The instruments were then stained to reveal remaining protein material and scored under a stereoscopic microscope. The results were analyzed by non-parametric statistical tests (α=0.05). Results No significant difference was found between the combination of the ultrasonic bath and the regular glass beaker and the same ultrasonic bath with the beaker lined with the cavitation intensifying sheets. The washer-disinfector left significantly more debris compared to the latter group when clinically-used files were evaluated (P≤0.001). The effect of instrument size on cleaning was not consistent. Conclusion None of the tested methods was able to remove all residual protein material from the files, however, it could be noted that the current study did not follow the reprocessing protocol provided by the manufacturer.
机译:目的为了比较以前使用过的不同尺寸的旋转Ni-Ti锉的消毒前清洁a。离体和b。在临床上可以通过清洗消毒器,常规的超声波浴和相同的超声波浴结合最近开发的空化强化方法来实现。方法学从阿姆斯特丹牙科学术中心(ACTA)的本科和研究生诊所收集了两套200张旋转Ni-Ti锉,其中一组以前曾用于离体,另一组曾用于临床。将仪器浸入酶溶液中,然后用洗衣机消毒器清洗,将常规超声浴与玻璃烧杯相结合,将同一个浴与烧杯相结合,内衬两个气穴增强片或两个标准塑料片。阳性对照包括未进行任何清洁的使用过的文件,阴性对照包括未使用的新文件。然后将仪器染色以显示残留的蛋白质物质,并在立体显微镜下评分。通过非参数统计检验分析结果(α= 0.05)。结果超声浴和普通玻璃烧杯的组合以及烧杯衬有气穴增强片的相同超声浴之间没有发现显着差异。当评估临床使用的锉刀时,与后者相比,清洗消毒器留下的碎片要多得多(P≤0.001)。仪器尺寸对清洁的影响不一致。结论测试的方法都无法从文件中删除所有残留的蛋白质材料,但是,应该指出的是,当前的研究并未遵循制造商提供的后处理协议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号